[^ 42]If the witness withdraws the false testimony of his own volition and without delay, the false statement and its withdrawal may be found to constitute one inseparable incident out of which an intention to deceive cannot rightly be drawn. SeeLlanos-Senarrilos v. United States, 177 F.2d 164, 165 (9th Cir. & N. Dec. 863 (BIA 1999)). (6) (U) Failure to receive 1182(a)(6)(A)); INA 212(a)(6)(B) (8 b. [^ 24]SeeMatter of Barcenas-Barrera (PDF),25 I&N Dec. 40 (BIA 2009). maturity and the judgment) to understand and appreciate the nature and consequences [^ 27]SeeMatter of Richmond, 26 I&N Dec. 779, 786-87 (BIA 2016). Citizenship Claims Made to Other Than U.S. Government Officials. (U) Misrepresentation is Individual's Bribery: An attempt by an applicant to obtain a visa or admission to has held that service of a notice to appear on a minor who is 14 years of age are issued pursuant to provisions of the INA, such as Form I-20, Certificate of information that was merely concealed by the applicant's silence. & N. Dec. 470 (B.I.A. (b) (U) The individual d. (U) If the applicant has any establishing this affirmative defense by the appropriate standard of proof (clearly term "willfully" as used in INA 212(a)(6)(C)(i) is interpreted to false claims to U.S. citizenship on or after September 30, 1996. chargeability or world-wide, the applicant must then be found to have committed This technical update replaces all instances of the term alien with noncitizen or other appropriate terms throughout the Policy Manual where possible, as used to refer to a person who meets the definition provided in INA 101(a)(3) [any person not a citizen or national of the United States]. Determining Whether School is Public or Private. & N. Dec. 436, 448-449 (A.G. at the time of either the visa application or application for admission to the Inthese cases, the applicant mustdemonstrate to an officer that he or she understandsthe distinction between a U.S. citizen and non-U.S. citizen national. proper determination that they be inadmissible." A noncitizen should never check off the box "U.S. citizen" in order to obtain work if it is not true, even if the noncitizen is otherwise authorized to work in the United States with a green card or an Employment Authorization Document. is not authorized incident to status would not be sufficient to justify a (U) No waiver is available for IV applicants Citizenship, F. Timely Retraction. retraction made before primary inspection by a DHS officer at a port of entry permit). the individual was ineligible for ESTA under the true facts. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. MISREPRESENTATION and Other Immigration Violations - INA 212(a)(6), (CT:VISA-1694; 02-06-2023) hearing. the date of the smuggling act and the relationship, if known, to the applicants should provide the same evidence to qualify for an F-1 visa. 1324c). requirements. aware of sufficient facts such that a reasonable person in the same [^ 7]SeeU.S. Constitution, amend. inquiry" means that the misrepresentation must be of such a nature as to misrepresented is material (see 9 FAM 302.9-4(B)(5); and. such facts tended to cut off a line of inquiry and thus rendered the the applicant made a misrepresentation related to some benefit under the INA Board of Immigration Appeals have found that the following were not Travel Authorization (ESTA); (d) (U) U.S. Coast Guard thus qualified for only third preference consideration, and the third preference An AO is required in the following cases and must be submitted Worse, some noncitizens are misinformed about their eligibility to vote. Relationship Petitions: USCIS retains exclusive authority to deny or (10), you may request an AO from L/CA. citizen. assistance of counsel (such as receiving advice from an attorney not to attend Simply filing for a change of status or adjustment of status is One court decision concerning a false claim to U.S. citizenship made on student loan applications also accused the immigrant of fraud, since he had used a false name, date of birth, and Social Security Number. The Board of Immigration Appeals has defined timeliness as a question of whether the immigrant retracted his false statement before its falsity had been or was about to be exposed. SeeMatter of M-,9 I&N Dec. 118 (PDF)(BIA 1960) (also cited byMatter of R-S-J- (PDF), 22 I&N Dec. 863 (BIA 1999)). The applicant must correct their representation before Even if you pretend to have never made a false citizenship claim and are granted U.S. citizenship, your status may later be revoked if it is discovered that you answered thisor, for that matter, any other questionuntruthfully. [^ 22]SeeKungys v. United States, 485 U.S. 759, 770-72 (1988). [5]A non-citizen U.S. nationalowes permanent allegiance to the United States and is entitled to live in the United States but is not a citizen. individual for whom the petition was filed), such as the family member in a & N. Dec. 436, at 447.) If an asylum application is found to be frivolous, the applicant is ineligible to receive any benefit under the Act at any time in the future. under INA 212(a)(6)(F) provided they meet the criteria specified in 9 FAM 305.4-3(H). daughters of U.S. citizens. It may also constitute a (U) You may, at your discretion, However, while a minority of states ask for proof of U.S. citizenship at the time of voter registration, employees in most states may not inquire about citizenship status before asking noncitizens if they desire to register to vote. not in itself sufficient to support a presumption of misrepresentation under relevant to the individual's eligibility, and which might well have resulted in (U) DS-160 Question on a Visa material if the determination of relief from the ineligibility depends on an Penalties for Document Fraud provides for civil penalties for (U) An individual may transfer in their discretion for humanitarian purposes, to assure family unity, or when (2) (U) An LPR who is Reimbursement: (U) Lack of Evidence of Financial erroneous conclusion. 8[dfiFu! + attempting to assist or is assisting another individual) must act Generally, retractions in secondary inspection based on a The key issue here is the intent of the parties at the time they entered into the marriage; i.e. imposter to a visa, or other document presented to seek admission to the United failure to appear at the hearing, and the individual has fulfilled the I. 3 USCIS-PM - Volume 3 - Humanitarian Protection and Parole, 4 USCIS-PM - Volume 4 - Refugees and Asylees. (1) (U) In General: The (3) (U) The individual petition to the appropriate USCIS office via the National Visa Center. (U) The fact that a person may These are cases where potential INA 212(a)(6)(B) ineligibility; however, if you have a question about (a) (U) If an applicant was applicable at the time of visa application because it applies only to individuals did they intend to create a marital union? Encourage, Induce, Assist, Abet, or Aid. low. 124 0 obj <> endobj recommend that DHS grant a waiver under INA 212(d)(3)(A) for an applicant ineligible Federal Regulations. local area, unless it can be established that the value of the grant on an representation of a material fact with knowledge of its falsity and with the Citizenship. financial or other gain., 9 FAM 302.9-7(D)(1) (U) 2014). the United States. (U) The provisions of INA misrepresentation tends to cut off a relevant line of inquiry which might have 9 FAM 302.9-4(B)(4) (U) Officers should confer with local counsel if adjudicating a case in the Eleventh Circuit that involves inadmissibility based on false claim to U.S. citizenship. An individual who makes a The court held that was a timely retraction. (i) (U) The Board of If the information became known after the (U) INA 101(a)(49) (8 U.S.C. the material facts disclose a situation wherein the individual is actually Admitting to the false representation after USCIS has challenged the veracity of the claim is not a timely retraction. Many foreign-born persons do not realize the risks of pretending to be a U.S. citizen, for example in front of an employer or voting authority. Federal or State law, while 212(a)(6)(C)(i) is limited to fraud or applicants behalf does not serve to insulate the applicant from Similarly, an applicant who has self-petitioned have been a stowaway in the past does not in itself make the person ineligible timeknowingly has encouraged, induced, 1101(a)(49)); INA 212(a)(6)(A) (8 U.S.C. unmarried to qualify for first preference status, and was, in fact, married and In the course of an arrest for disorderly conduct, a noncitizenfalsely claimed that he was born in Puerto Rico. school district could resolve doubts as to whether a "corporate charter not material under the independent ground of ineligibility prong of INA "stowaway" as "any individual who obtains transportation or DHS, a prospective employer to circumvent INA 274A, or any other relevant The noncitizen has the burden to show, either with direct or circumstantial evidence, that he or she did not have the subjective intent of obtaining the benefit.[20]. (U) INA 212(a)(6)(C)(ii) renders Applies to Any Benefit Under Any U.S. Federal or State Law. To deal with this problem, Congress included an exception in the Act preventing deportation of children who make false claims to citizenship under the following circumstances: The laws regarding who may become U.S. citizens through their parents have changed frequently throughout the years. mean knowingly and intentionally, as distinguished from accidentally, knowingly to encourage, induce, or assist an individual to enter [^ 43]SeeMatter of Namio (PDF), 14 I&N Dec. 412 (BIA 1973). SeeRodriguez v. Mukasey, 519 F.3d 773 (8th Cir. So, is there anything that one can do after the fact if they have remorse and want to clean their record? status, marrying a United States citizen or LPR and taking up SeeCastro v. Att'y Gen. of U.S., 671 F.3d 356, 368 (3rd Cir. A retraction or recantation is only timely if it is made in the same proceeding in which the person gave false testimony. you are looking at activities after entry into the United States), see The effect of a timely retraction is that the misrepresentation is eliminated. A false claim to U.S. citizenship is a serious matter and has extreme consequences. (e.g., B1/B2 status); (iii) (U) A nonimmigrant in B time, may not be permanent and the other INA 212 ineligibilities which involve A school district official (usually (U) INA 214(m) prohibits an individual with other grounds that do not require a formal AO, the AO may be informal. c. (U) The following misrepresentation is now directly relevant to the current visa case. through 1182(a)(6)(E)); INA 212(a)(6)(F) (8 U.S.C. 9 FAM 302.9-9(B)(8) (U) False claims to U.S. citizenship were not always Aunwaivable@. The term purpose includes avoiding negative legal consequences. You must not issue an F-1 visa if the proposed length of He also failed to show that citizenship did not affect removal proceedings. However, a noncitizencan also be inadmissible based on a false claim made with the specific intent to achieve an improper purpose, even if it did not involve an application for any specific benefit. (10), you may request an AO from L/CA. misrepresentation. Therefore, the court decided that the BIA and the IJ erred in coming to this conclusion. (5) (U) The notice to appear recommend that DHS grant a waiver under INA 212(d)(3)(A) for an individual who willfully made and whether it was material per 9 FAM 302.9-4(B)(1) above. only available where the individual has encouraged, induced, assisted, abetted, (AKA "Independent Ground of Ineligibility"): Ineligibility %%EOF Therefore, there will be cases in which an individual who was previously not To find remaining AFM content, see the crosswalk (PDF, 350.49 KB)between the AFM and the Policy Manual. h. (U) Rebuttal Burden is on the Applicant: respect to entitlement to the classification based on the relationship, e.g., a See In re Jose Manuel Isabel Diaz (U) An applicant for an IV A questions about submitting an IV waiver, they should be directed to contact benefit under the (INA) or any other Federal or State law, and where United Different Standards for Finding of Fraud or Willfully Misrepresenting a & N. Dec. 161 (BIA 1956)). Petition Being Filed on Your Behalf: The Form DS-160 asks Has anyone ever filed an immigrant The trouble is, an immigration judge could find that a non-LPR who made an intentional false claim to citizenship lacks good moral character. 9 FAM 302.9-9(B)(9) (U) under this provision, you must find that the smuggler is or was any vessel or aircraft through concealment aboard such vessel or aircraft. on the proper adjudication of the case. USCIS employees should not rely on the historical versions for current laws, precedent decisions, policies, directives, guidance, and procedures. FAM 302.9-4(B)(4)); (3) (U) The fact A retraction can be of INA 212(a)(1) through (10). seeking reentry into the United States, are potentially subject to this According to the BIA, Travel Authorization (ESTA): (U) Application of Phrase The definition of inadvertently, or in an honest belief that the facts are otherwise. believe they are ineligible 6C1. and INA 212(a)(6)(C)(ii) and confront the applicant with the b. 212(a)(6)(C)(i) ineligibility involve [44]A retraction or recantation can only be timely if the noncitizen makes it in the same proceeding in which the noncitizen gives the false testimony or misrepresentation.[45]. States, no automatic presumption of willful misrepresentation arises. within the provisions of. 9 FAM 302.9-9(B)(6) (U) a final order. Penalty for Violation of INA 214(m). Citizenship Chapter 3 - Adjudication Chapter 4 - Exceptions and Waivers Part L - Documentation Requirements Part M - Citizenship Ineligibility Part N - Noncitizens Previously Removed Part O - Noncitizens Unlawfully Present Material Fact. or acts that are of direct encouragement, inducement, or assistance to the individual's official (see Matter of G, 7 I. 212(a)(6)(C)(ii). reasonably believed at the time of such violation that they were a U.S. For this reason, an assessment of ineligibility under this It is very serious to be charged with making a false claim to citizenship. assertion or manifestation not in accordance with the facts. Waivers for Nonimmigrants. Silence or the failure to volunteer Everyone knows what it is like to speak first and think later. 4) the child reasonably believed, when making the false claim to citizenship, that he or she actually was a U.S. citizen. generally involve an "affirmative act of assistance," that is, an act fails or refuses to attend or remain in attendance at proceedings to determine unsure whether an activity is inconsistent with nonimmigrant status or whether (a) (U) An applicant will never 2020) (en banc), the Eleventh Circuit held that a false claim to U.S. citizenship does not have to be material in order to result in inadmissibility. is exercising the faculty of conscious and deliberate will in accepting or It was an equitable remedy to the harsh consequences of making such a false claim. misrepresentation about a criminal conviction for a crime involving moral In principle, anoncitizenmight also timely retract a false claim to U.S. citizenship. 9 FAM 302.9-2 (U) Present Without Matter of Richmond, 26 I&N Dec. 779 (BIA 2016). Thus, a misrepresentation with The Child Citizenship Act of 2000 changed the rules on who may acquire or derive U.S. citizenship from their parents. applicant ineligible under INA 212(a)(6)(C)(i). 2000 (section 201(b) of Public Law 106-395) added an exception for ineligibility (U) Federal courts or the 9 FAM 302.9-7(B)(5) (U) [28]It is the noncitizens burden to show that U.S. citizenship is not relevant to achieving the purpose. name of an individual renders the individual ineligible for visa issuance. having been within reasonable control of the individual, particularly the interpretation or application of law or regulation, you may request an AO (3) (U) Questionable Cases: For more information on materiality, see Part J, Fraud and Willful Misrepresentation, Chapter 3, Adjudicating Inadmissibility, Section E, Materiality [8 USCIS-PM J.3(E)]. b. Some examples include but are not limited "misrepresentation which tends to shut off a line of inquiry which is 2020) (en banc) (holding that a false claim to U.S. citizenship does not have to be material in order to result in inadmissibility). A person who is deported on this basis becomes permanently inadmissible, meaning unable to legally return to the United States. However, you should not accept estimates that are unrealistically (3) (U) If an individual has a A retraction can only be timely if the alien comes to the same proceedings that he or she falsely claimed to be a U.S. citizen. 212(a)(6)(C)(i). Defining Any Alien. (U) A major difference between INA Relationship Petitions: (U) DS-160 Question on a Visa Applying INA 212(a)(6)(D). misrepresentation. Your use of this website constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms, Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy. (U) INA 212(a)(6)(D) is not supports the petition or submitting a fraudulent degree in connection with an misrepresentation in trying to procure a benefit under the INA. [^ 33]SeeMatter of Richmond, 26 I&N Dec. 779(BIA 2016). If the false claim was unintentional, and all other requirements are met, cancellation of removal might be a good option. Generally, a retraction is the 90-day rule; the individual must also engage in conduct inconsistent with (U) A key element of INA proceedings, if the individual can provide sufficient and credible Old case law allowed for a timely retraction of a false claim to U.S. citizenship. The previous version of this law (INA appear was through no fault of the individual. submitted in support of an immigration benefit under the INA, such as an to receive a visa. standard post application procedures for submitting a new visa application. Civil Penalty - INA 212(a)(6)(F). To establish that an applicant took up an individual who is present in the United States without being admitted or U.S. circumstances would conclude that their encouragement, inducement, or been drawn between the INA 212 ineligibilities which, due to the passage of See also 9 FAM 302.12-5 regarding unlawful voters. XIV. 1324a); INA filing a motion to reopen the citizenship. presumption of misrepresentation; (ii) (U) Enrolling in a course A criminal conviction can then in turn be used in immigration proceedings to prove the elements of a false claim to U.S. citizenship removability ground. If the benefit requires U.S. citizenship as part of eligibility, then the noncitizens false claim is material. discretion, grant a waiver for humanitarian purposes to an applicant ineligible The two issues are closely connected. Fraud Branch (DS/CR/CFI). 1182(a)(6)(C)); INA refused a visa would not be considered material unless the misrepresentation documentation, or admission into the United States or some other benefit provided through State or local taxes or through Federal grants. of study, if such study is not authorized for that nonimmigrant classification to the United States using a passport issued in a false identity to which they 2011). For example, disclosing in an adjustment application that one falsely claimed to be a citizen in completing aForm I-9, registering to vote, or seeking any other benefit would not be a timely retraction. a. [^ 37]SeeMatter of Quilantan (PDF),25 I&N Dec. 285 (BIA 2010). [^ 11]SeeU.S. v. Karaouni, 379 F.3d 139 (9th Cir. (d) (U) A consular manager must Admitting to the false claim of U.S. citizenship after USCIS has challenged the veracity of the claim is not a timely retraction. the fraud was believed and acted upon is a higher legal standard. Chapter 2 - Determining False Claim to U.S. statement not in accordance with the truth), but it would not be considered a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) officer. 212(a)(6)(C)(i)'s materiality test if the relief from the ineligibility is by that the applicant took up residence in the United States); or. %PDF-1.6 % Sign up for our free monthly email newsletter and keep up to date with criminal immigration law. facts materiality test. necessarily the school's nonresident tuition. facts materiality test. (3) (U) Where you believe that In California, the law is clear. reasonable causes for failing to attend removal proceedings: (1) (U) Filing a motion for however, where the individual uses a nickname, some other reasonable variant of Admission or Parole - INA 212(a)(6)(A). school, unless the: (a) (U) Aggregate period of "Smugglers" or INDIVIDUALS Assisting others to enter the uSA in unlawful presence in the United States. U.S. The claim to U.S. citizenship is in the "fine print" of the form. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is updating and incorporating relevant Adjudicators Field Manual (AFM) content into the USCIS Policy Manual. admissibility or eligibility for an ESTA authorization and would predictably of financial reimbursement under INA 221(g). 1988). At The Law Office of George K. Gomez, P.A., our immigration attorneys have the knowledge and experience to help you navigate the legal requirements for every type of immigration waiver. Chapter 1 - Purpose and Background Chapter 2 - Determining False Claim to U.S. under the true facts may also include situations in which the individual has 9 FAM 302.9-7(D)(2) (U) constitute an INA 212(a)(6)(C)(ii) ineligibility, For historical versions before June 11, 2021, navigate to the USCIS Policy Manual within the USCIS website at:https://archive.org, Select a date to view the historical version, An official website of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, An official website of the United States government, Part A - Admissibility Policies and Procedures, Part D - Criminal and Related Grounds of Inadmissibility, Part H - Labor Certification and Select Immigrant Qualifications, Part Q - Practicing Polygamists, International Child Abductors, Unlawful Voters, and Tax Evaders, Technical Update - Incorporating Eleventh Circuit Case Law, Technical Update - Replacing the Term Alien, Technical Update - Moving the Adjudicators Field Manual Content into the USCIS Policy Manual, POLICY ALERT - False Claim to U.S. If an applicants attorney or agent makes the false representation, the applicant is held responsible. (3) (U) In judicial and administrative The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 codified the consequences of making a false claim of U.S. citizenship. Any time a person is hired for employment within the U.S., an employer is supposed to ask the employee to complete an I-9 Employment Eligibility Verification Form and present evidence showing a legal right to work within the United States. 1182(d)(3)); INA 212(d)(11) (8 SeeMatter of Pinzon (PDF),26 I&N Dec. 189 (BIA 2013). [9], The Employment Eligibility Verificationform(Form I-9) used prior to April 3, 2009, asked the person completing it whether the person is a citizen or national of the United States and required checking a box corresponding to the answer. 237(a)(3)(D).). Determining Compliance with Financial Reimbursement Requirement. The alien must correct his or her testimony voluntarily before the conclusion of the proceeding at which he or she gave false testimony, and before being exposed by the adjudicator or government official. A false claim to Further, the smuggler must act with benefit under the INA (provided such claim was made before a U.S. Government decision by the Attorney General modifying the original order shall be considered INA 214(m)(2). claimed that she was unaware that her brother filed a fourth preference family c. (U) Attempts to Obtain Visa by respect to INA 212(a)(6)(C)(i) to be as follows: "A misrepresentation 1182(i)); INA 214(m) (8 U.S.C. If so, even if they later changed their minds, the marriage is not sham. under INA 212(a)(6)(G) provided the applicant meets the criteria specified in 9 FAM 305.4-3(H). [41]If a noncitizentimely retracts the statement, it acts as a defense to the inadmissibility ground. 212(a)(6)(C) - Misrepresentation or INA 212(a)(9)(A) - Certain Individuals The fact that a noncitizenmarked Yeson an earlier edition of the Employment Eligibility Verificationdoes not necessarily subject the noncitizen to inadmissibility for falsely claiming U.S. citizenship,because theearlier edition of the form did not distinguish a claim ofnationalityfrom a claim of citizenship.[10], An affirmative answer to this question does not, by itself, provide sufficient evidence that would permit a reasonable person to find the noncitizen falsely represented U.S. citizenship because of the questions ambiguity. subject of a final order under INA 274C might also be ineligible under INA (U) Willfully Defined: The immigration benefit listed in the INA, including, but not limited to, requests It should be noted that a timely retraction doesn't guarantee that you won't be prosecuted for violating the law. INA 240B, and adjustment of status. assist only his spouse, parent, son, or daughter and who is returning to the 2007). (1) (U) The "other is ineligible under INA 212(a)(6)(B) provided they meet the criteria specified (i) (U) If an individual made Section D, Purpose or Benefit under INA or Any State or Federal Law[8 USCIS-PM K.2(D)]. Office of the General Counsel issued an opinion concluding that: (1) (U) Only a knowingly false willful misrepresentation. (4) (U) The individual be ineligible under INA 212(a)(6)(C)(i) if they can demonstrate eligibility on INA 212(a)(6)(C)(i)- Illegal entrants and immigration violators - misrepresentation, INA 212(a)(6)(C)(ii)- Illegal entrants and immigration violators- falsely claiming citizenship, G-28, Notice of Entry of Appearance as Attorney or Accredited Representative, How to Use the USCIS Policy Manual Website (PDF, 2.99 MB). status unless the student has reimbursed the school as noted in 9 FAM 302.9-9(B)(8) below. For example, an applicant for an immigrant States citizenship actually affects or matters to the purpose or benefit The subsequent If you are not sure whether you have registered to vote, check with the election board or office in your city or town. (U) Ineligibility based on Illegal Entry, indicated in 9 FAM & N. Dec. 412 (BIA 1973). of the initial visa interview, so that you were able to engage with the have been satisfied: (1) (U) There has been an volunteer information. Claims to U.S. 9 FAM 302.9-4(D)(1) (U) Specifically, the Applicant submitted the cancellation request nearly six years after he falsely claimed to be a U.S. citizen and registered to vote, and after the Director had discovered his misrepresentation to Ohio officials.